Subject: Public health risks of proposed 5G rollout in __________ - without covering letter

Attachments: Wi-Fi & 5G.pdf

Dear [Councillor (DELETE AS APPROPRIATE)] <representative-name>,

I am a resident of [the __________ EU Region | __________ Constituency | <division> County Division | <ward-name> Parish|Borough|District Council Ward (DELETE AS APPROPRIATE)] and I write on behalf of the __________ group to express concern about the future rollout of 5G communications technology in __________ (town) and elsewhere in __________ (county).

The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) and Public Health England’s (PHE’s) Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (CRCE) assure us that their safety standards are rigorous and trustworthy and that 5G technology is completely safe with regard to potential impacts on human health and the environment. However, extensive investigation reveals that:

There are thousands of peer-reviewed scientific studies published over many decades, that establish an irrefutable litany of deleterious biological effects of microwave radiation in the 800MHz – 300GHz frequency range. ^[1]
Among the serious effects noted are: brain tumours, gliomas and other cancers ^[2], headaches ^[3], insomnia ^[4], cognitive impairment ^[5], neurological and neuro-developmental disorders ^[6], ovum abnormalities ^[7], impaired sperm motility, quality and morphology ^[8], heritable single- and double-strand DNA damage ^[9], oxidative tissue damage ^[10], blood cell damage ^[11], cardiac stress ^[12], skin diseases ^[13], eye lens opacity ^[14], damage to plants and animals especially insects and pollinators ^[15], amongst many other effects.
The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) safety standards referenced by Government regulators are based on an out of date, inadequate and discredited understanding of the many complex interactions between non-ionising electromagnetic radiation and living organisms ^[16]. ICNIRP’s so-called ‘safety’ levels are several orders of magnitude higher than those known to cause serious problems ^[17].
The regulatory bodies have been captured by the multi-trillion dollar telecommunications industry and now serve industry interests not those of public health ^[18].
No safety research or monitoring is planned for the existing UK 5G pilots, a total abandonment the Precautionary Principle.
Major insurers such as Lloyds of London and Swiss Re refuse to insure against 5G health liabilities ^[19].
A global coalition of hundreds of eminent scientists has called for a moratorium on 5G rollout, pending proper safety research.^[20]
Several states, cities and towns in the UK, Europe and elsewhere have already implemented such a moratorium.^[21]
The Council of Europe’s Resolution 1815 of April 2011 expressed a unanimous vote to ban Wi-Fi and mobile ‘phones from schools and to prioritise reduction of human exposure to all sources of EM radiation^[22]
Some locations where 5G has already been rolled out are monitoring or already reporting health issues.^[23]

According to prominent EMF researcher Dr Martin L Pall PhD (Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University):

“Putting in tens of millions of 5G antennae without a single biological test of safety has got to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world.” [emphasis added]^[24]

We have here the makings of a 21^st Century public health and environmental catastrophe compared to which tobacco, DDT, asbestos and opioids will pale into insignificance.

I have attached a PDF format leaflet that highlights the main concerns, printed copies of which are available on request. For further information please refer to the links on the Campaign Resources website (top menu > Campaigns > Wi-Fi & 5G > References). See also the excellent 5G Crisis Summit video documentary set^[25] hosted on the media page of the Campaign Resources website – particularly recommended are:

Richard Lear - Root Cause of Chronic Disease Epidemics

In the light of all this, I am deeply concerned that central Government has ruled that local planning authorities may not take health or environmental concerns into account when considering 5G-related planning applications. This is extraordinary, since it conflicts directly with a Planning Authority’s legal obligation to protect the health and wellbeing of the population in their area, especially children. It conflicts with Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights^[26]. It conflicts with the legal principle that Government signatories to a contract bear ultimate responsibility and liability for public health and other outcomes. Elected representatives such as yourself also bear a personal responsibility for protecting the health and safety of those whom they represent, which cannot lawfully be negated by adopting a position of wilful ignorance.

I am hoping that you will undertake to: