Copyright © 2017-

It is clear that human activity can have a myriad of adverse environmental and ecological impacts including pollution, deforestation, habitat/biodiversity loss and resource depletion, to name but a few. Efforts to address these serious problems are commendable and necessary.
We are constantly bombarded with claims about an impending climate crisis, and told that human activity is to blame. The 'anthropogenic global warming' (AGW) hypothesis posits that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are contributing to a ‘greenhouse effect’ that is causing the planet to heat up. We are told that 97% of climate scientists subscribe to this view and that ‘the science is settled’. These claims, however, are not based on facts.
The policy proposed by authoritarian global governance is ‘Net Zero’—reduction of CO2 emissions and replacement of fossil fuel use with ‘clean, renewable’ energy. Solar radiation management, carbon capture, carbon taxation and emission trading schemes are being implemented around the globe. They want us to eat bugs instead of meat. We are expected to submit to increasingly drastic measures that will not only have dire socio-
This double-
References
Download PDF artwork:
Our own research reveals that the frequently touted 'scientific consensus' does not in fact exist, and that a large number of eminent academics and scientists vigorously dispute the orthodox climate narrative on a variety of well-
We have published some documents which provide details of the scientists and the science:
The information in the above documents all resides in a database that is also available online through a web app that supports interactive querying of the lists of climate sceptic scientists, their peer-
Visit the climate science web app
Please report any issues or suggestions for improvement to the GitHub project page
(check for existing issue before logging a new one!)

Images by ibrandify and storyset on Freepik